Thursday 21 February 2013

Weird People I Lived with in Galway, Volume 3

It is time for me to recount the final chapter of my trilogy on the social rejects and degenerates I lived with in the west of Ireland. As is the way of things, fate saved the worst until last. Towards the end of my stay there, one of my two sane housemates had to leave. His room was taken by a Burmese man, whose name was Ed, but actually was Thang. At first glance, he was a marked improvement on the previous addition to the house, as he washed both his body and his clothes. He seemed to possess social graces, and he offered us vodka in an attempt to develop some camaraderie with his new housemates. Some could take umbrage to that, as they may consider camaraderie amongst men a sign of chauvinism. Can men have camaraderie yet still remain respectful towards women, you might ask? I didn't ask, as it's such a boring question, worthy only of someone eager to have people flock to their Twitter page (a sign of an exceptionally low character).
We first caught a glance of Ed's underbelly when discussing the secrets of the bedroom. I can assure you now that neither I nor my housemate brought up the topic, but Ed was eager to regale us with detailed information on the sensitive spots of the female anatomy. He then divulged that women could never be truly satisfied, as they couldn't be filled. Both I and the other listener could only nod at this information, as we were unprepared for such an insight.
While initially fazed by the strangeness of the new addition to the house, the anthropologist inside me eventually decided to take advantage of the opportunity and explore Burmese culture through the portal of Ed. Even though I had only one member of his culture to study, and despite my academic lens being smeared by revulsion for the man, I felt I could achieve an objective and accurate analysis. Here are my finding, as jotted down in a notebook, shortly after leaving Galway:

The Burmese man's libido is charged with an efficient exigency, leading him to habitually solicit prostitutes. Even in unlikely circumstances, such as I have observed in Galway — where the level of precipitation discourages the business of selling oneself on the street — the Burmese man can seek out and easily discover a warm body in which he can pay to insert himself. The bond between Burmese males is strong, presumably to the detriment of forming relationships of mutual respect with women. When sexually satisfied, the male never hesitates to boast to the other members of his troop. One assumes that among his fellow Burmese males, the successful consumer of flesh would be lauded, but we were never afforded an opportunity to put this assumption to the test, and our ethnocentricity kept us from truly appreciating this phenomenon.
Deep at the heart of this race is a laziness, at least among the males. When confronted with even the least taxing of chores, the frontal lobe of the Burmese male secretes an anaesthetic chemical that numbs the part of the brain controlling hard work. One most likely will find crusty pots and dusty floors in the decor of the Burmese household. This laziness most likely accounts for their cultural arrest. The Burmese still admire the BeeGees and ABBA to a degree that should have expired over recent decades. 1 Perhaps the greatest evidence of this cultural stagnation is the great religious intolerance. Our subject, who subscribed to Roman Catholicism, considered Jews manipulative and untrustworthy, while slandering "aggressive" Muslims. "The cloth of the Church has never been wrong", we were told, in a sentiment that most likely explained his censure of homosexuals, who were "very stupid" (an expression that is inextricable from Burmese culture). Burmese censure extends to arbitrary  and peculiar targets as well, such as that which is dependent on the fortuitous sway of luck. During the 2006 World Cup, Ed regarded every missed shot on goal as contemptuous, allowing an innumerable amount of "so stuh-pid" utterances to slip from his mouth during games. 

While Burmese culture is a sordid complex of mendacity and deviancy, it can be quantified in a value system derived from recurring patterns. My research enabled me to produce the following key for  approximating Burmese values:

So, after some time in Ed's company, the Smellbag and I bonded over our mutual disgust. I went home that summer, as school was out, and I never returned to study in Galway. I heard that Ed was expelled from the university for ignoring several letters warning him not to watch porn on campus.

I sometimes sit and think about my time in Galway and the many strange people I shared a roof with. There is no doubt in my mind that had I stayed in the windiest and rainiest place I have ever known, I would have cohabited with many more peculiar creatures. Alas, I forfeited my PhD, returned home, and halted my descent into a fatter, poorer, wetter, and more incredulous being.



It was either this or a picture of Galway Hooker beer.





1 I was willing to make allowances for the cultural gap and the fact of English being his second language, but knowing me, knowing you, there was nothing I could do.

Saturday 9 February 2013

The Royal 'We'

I would like you all to know that I pay tax. My taxes go towards funding and maintaining this country. See the education system? Yeah, that's right, all those schools and teachers are paid for by me. See those hospitals? All those sick people are being treated by medicine, nurses, and doctors paid for by me. The abhorrent troll of boringness that lurks in your head is telling you I should have taken the opportunity in that last sentence to mention the dire state of our health system. I'm falling asleep just thinking about you thinking about such a tiresome idea.
I'm digressing. See the roads? See the water you use to take your long shower (and symbolically reenter your mother's womb)? That's right; I paid for that.

...

Sorry, I nodded off just thinking about you reflexively mentioning the poor state of some of our roads and how we will have to pay more for water in the future. I was woken up by someone saying 'Only in Ireland.' in my near dream state. I escape into my dreams to escape such perfunctory (and demonstrably wrong) cliches. Anyway, my fellow taxpayers and I pay for all those things and more. We pay for child support, unemployment benefit, and pensions. I'm afraid to mention public transport, politicians wages, or the burdensome, needless bailout, as it will only produce depressing, hibernation-inducing, worn-out comments (comments that secretly resign to the situation, with an unimaginative sense of fait accompli). Yes, this country is supported by the Royal, tax-paying 'We'. People suffer not these burdens; tax-payers do. Citizens are not basis of society; those who get a percentage creamed off their pay packets are. When a politician makes a poor decision, We remind him not that he depends on Our vote, but that he depends on Our patronage. When money is squandered, We remind Our political leaders that it is Our money that has been misused. Our word is sacred, as long as We involuntarily contribute to the state's revenue.
Paying tax is the crown of the good life, and all the great figures of morality throughout history championed paying one's tax above all else. Socrates, the sage Athenian, claimed that once one understood the Good, one would be compelled to act upon it and pay one's taxes. Jesus of Nazareth, the central figure of the religion of billions, paid at least 25% tax on his carpentry sales. He said to his apostles "Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's. That is the way and the truth and the light. The word of my father will flow from your lips, like a sweet nectar, and the paradise will hence forth be yours." The Prophet Muhammad often asserted the importance of tax. "Ah, for feck's sake, lads, stop making portraits of me", he said, "I don't pay 40% tax to haveta put up with this shite."1 Gandhi, that self-righteous son-of-a-bitch, always paid at least 35% tax on his income, regardless of his other acts of civil disobedience. Dr Martin Luther King Jr., the American civil rights leader, spoke passionately about the subject, declaring "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by the money that is involuntarily taken from their income each week."2 When South African anti-apartheid leader Nelson Mandela was imprisoned in Robben Island, he took solace in the comforting thought that life was like his income, and his jail time was like a 27% tax. He has willed himself to live this long, because it is far easier to approximate a percentage when the number is close to 100. For those of you who believe the above characters are inexpert at divining the good, because most of them (if not all of them) believed in some sort of divinity, I should mention that Richard Dawkins also believes in paying taxes. However, this is irrelevant, as Dawkins (outside of evolutionary biology) doesn't know what he is talking about.

We pay our taxes. It is the summum bonum and the hallmark of a true and noble character. Let a person be judged on what they are forced to contribute to the coffers of their country. As for those who are not contributing? You have the right to unleash the full force of your censure. Worry not if they cannot pay due to circumstance; you're paying for the privilege.



My accountant, who helps ensure I get 'taxed to the hilt.'




1 From the 2009 Hiberno-English translation of the Quran.

2 I just know you're now going to check out the 'I have a dream' speech, as I've planted a seed in your mind. I also predict you'll try the 17 minute version first, before realising that it's too much of a time commitment and watching the two minute highlight video instead.

Everyday I'm TEFLin'

I have decided to spend some time talking about my 'real' job, as I have only touched on it before, and there seems to be a lot of ignorance surrounding what I actually do. Many assume that my job is easy, given the obvious perks, such as finishing at lunchtime on most days, and it is difficult to believe I get paid to correct people, a great passion of mine. TEFL does, however, make demands on one's energy levels, not to mention one's patience. The job is exhausting, and you are forever weighed down by the expectations of everyone, who genuinely wonders when you will get a real job. We language teachers face the additional problem of continually looking towards the future to ensure that the industry's prosperity continues. I have to admit that futurology is not one of the many kinds of expertise I possess. This is mostly because nobody is an expert on futurology. Too many unknown factors lie in wait to shape the future, and some of the most important ones are surely beyond our predictive capabilities. Despite these limitations, we must endeavour to foresee what lies ahead, as we may be able to mitigate or prevent the many ills that could befall us. 1
Until my philosophical and literary masterpieces are published, I'll have to grind it out as a TEFL teacher, and it is in my interest to try and forecast what problems might arise for the industry. Clearly the distinct shortage of talented teachers has failed to hold the industry back.  The further you travel away from an English speaking country, the less dignified the situation becomes, and you encounter teachers whose primary skills are drunkenness and lechery. If they sound like a cool bunch of sea pirates, then you have misunderstood me.
Some of my colleagues fear that Chinese will overtake English as the most important language in the world. I disagree. English is the language of business and the internet, and it is much more widely spoken. Also, — if you can excuse my Yellow Pearl depiction of the Chinese as insidious and power-hungry expansionists — they probably would have made it happen by now, or, to speak more accurately, will had done it by now. You see, the real threat is time travel. Not only will our timeline be contaminated, but it will leave the language unable to adequately describe reality. We will be unable to communicate plans to travel back in time to change something. In the advent of such a possibility, I have created a new tense, called the future past perfect simple (I have plans to further complicate the name, honouring the age-old TEFL tradition of giving parts of language names that seem like complete misnomers at the outset). Learners will most likely confuse future past perfect simple using 'will' and future past perfect simple with 'going to'. Allow me to clarify.

We use future past perfect simple with 'will' when we make that decision at that moment. So, for example, you're devastated that you girlfriend just left you, and you want to go back to before you met her and prevent it from ever happening, you would say "I'll had prevented me from ever meeting her." If the plan was made in the past, then you use "going to". For example, if you are getting into the time machine to erase a relationship, you would call your ex and say "I'm going to had prevent us from ever meeting, and there's nothing you can or could have done about it, you heartless bitch." If it is an arrangement, made with another person and (usually) at a specific time, then you use the present continuous past perfect simple. For example, "I'm hadding prevented ever meeting her tomorrow and two years ago."
If it's a prediction, then we use either 'will' or 'going to'. The two terms are interchangeable in most circumstances. However, if there is current evidence — perhaps detectable changes in the timeline 2  — then we use 'going to'. For example:

English speakers will had gone back to alter the timeline and make English the most widely-spoken language in the twenty-first century.

English is the most widely-spoken language in the world, as someone is going to had gone back in time and had made it so.


So, can you remember all that? If not, reassure yourself with the old adage: Those who can, do. And those poor saps who can't, teach. Those who can't teach, teach TEFL. And those who can't teach TEFL, write blogs.

I'm going to had made sweet love to Cleopatra herself.



1 Aside from death, of course, which is inevitable and will ruthlessly destroy you and all of those dearest to you!

2 One assumes that with the advent of time travel, some sort of temporal shield will also be invented. Tachyons usually do the trick.